I am copying debian-legal on this mail. Please include me on any
replies, as I am not subscribed to that list.
Adrian Bunk wrote:
the LZW patent is still valid in Europe and Japan.
Due to the possible legal risk for your users in Europe and Japan it's
still required to keep LZW code out of
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 01:17:18PM -0800, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
> I am copying debian-legal on this mail. Please include me on any
> replies, as I am not subscribed to that list.
I'm not subscribed to debian-legal, too.
Please Cc me on replies.
Below are my opinions on this issue.
> Adrian Bun
Adrian Bunk wrote:
Section 2.2.3 of your policy says:
Packages must be placed in _non-free_ or _non-US/non-free_ if they are
not compliant with the DFSG or are encumbered by patents or other
legal issues that make their distribution problematic.
This section clearly states, that pa
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 01:17:18PM -0800, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
> I am copying debian-legal on this mail. Please include me on any
> replies, as I am not subscribed to that list.
>
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> >the LZW patent is still valid in Europe and Japan.
> >
> >Due to the possible legal risk
[ Please CC replies to me, or better, take your comments to the
appropriate place. ]
Offhand, I see the following people discuss the proposed Apache
license:
Brian M. Carlson
Mahesh T. Pai
David Turner
Don Armstrong
Adam Warner
Anthony DeRobertis
But I wonder if you legal-eagles missed this par
5 matches
Mail list logo
