Hi, i've found myself in a very interesting case, i have a vendor who is
trying to license their source code as propietary. I'm looking for some
help about information that helps me to backup my position to convince them
why they shouldn't do that, and also why it doesn't benefit our bussiness
(
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-25 18:37]:
> Can you explain what the policy is for which non-freeness issues
> *will* be regarded as "sarge-ignore"?
...
> It is difficult, from these data, to discern what exactly the policy
> for "sarge-ignore" and licensing issues is.
I'm afraid
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 12:41:07AM +1100, Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project
Leader wrote:
> * Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-25 18:37]:
> > Can you explain what the policy is for which non-freeness issues
> > *will* be regarded as "sarge-ignore"?
> ...
> > It is difficult, from thes
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 12:41:07AM +1100, Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project
Leader wrote:
> * Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-25 18:37]:
> > Can you explain what the policy is for which non-freeness issues
> > *will* be regarded as "sarge-ignore"?
> ...
> > It is difficult, from thes
4 matches
Mail list logo