Hi folks,
as a part of my Application i looked at the mpg123 package and took also
a look to mpg321. Inside of this analysis i took a look to the homepage
of thompson. There is a pricing list for every decoder that is able to
play mp3 files [1]. This means for every decoder program round about
0.
On Sun, May 11, 2003 at 02:38:42PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> as a part of my Application i looked at the mpg123 package and took also
> a look to mpg321. Inside of this analysis i took a look to the homepage
> of thompson. There is a pricing list for every decoder that is able to
> play mp3 fi
Am Son, 2003-05-11 um 15.49 schrieb Andrew Suffield:
> On Sun, May 11, 2003 at 02:38:42PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > as a part of my Application i looked at the mpg123 package and took also
> > a look to mpg321. Inside of this analysis i took a look to the homepage
> > of thompson. There is a
Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Arnoud Galactus Engelfriet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Note that the "distortion or mutilation" has to hurt the
> > honor or reputation of the author. Here in the Netherlands
> > this is the case if the owner of a house decides to put up
> > new blinds in a color t
Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> As I read the law, it says that there are some rights over the work
> which the artist *cannot* renounce. You would have it that if the
> artist uses a certain form of license, the rights have been
> effectively renounced. If that were a correct interpretation, then
> > > According to the DFSG this makes every mp3 decoder non-free or even
> > > undistributable.
> >
> > It doesn't, actually. Although it might make it non-distributable
> > under US law, and some other countries which honour the relevant
> > patents.
>
> As I said above
>
the decision made s
On Sun, May 11, 2003 at 01:19:16AM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Sec. 105. - Subject matter of copyright: United States Government works
>
> > Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of
> > the United States Governm
Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Scripsit Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Sec. 105. - Subject matter of copyright: United States Government works
>
> > Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of
> > the United States Government, but the United
Arnoud Galactus Engelfriet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> People that pass by the house do not know whether the blinds
> were the architect's design or not. They might remember that
> the house was designed by him, and then conclude that he was
> very stupid for putting those ugly blinds on the hou
Arnoud Galactus Engelfriet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As far as I know, the heirs must follow the author's intentions
> when applying the inherited moral right. They cannot decide
> for themselves whether *they* like the change, they must guess
> whether the now deceased author would have liked
On Sun, May 11, 2003 at 10:10:44AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> If they actually cared, I suspect xmms and several other groups would have
> been contacted by lawyers by now. As Andrew noted, there are also legal
> avenues of defense as well.
they claim us$ 0.75 per unit or some fix price
On Sun, May 11, 2003 at 10:45:44PM +0200, Patrick Mauritz wrote:
> after someone mentioned that change about 1 year late on slashdot,
The slashdot post was (as one would expect from a slashdot post) bogus;
nothing changed. This was discussed here at the time; search the list
archives.
--
Glenn
On Sun, May 11, 2003 at 10:10:44AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> The patent is held in Germany which means there is no safe place to keep the
> packages if we decide to (re)move them.
Hey, wait, I thought they *lost* that war...
Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Gesetz!
/me watches as this thread
Hi Zack,
On Sonntag 20 April 2003 03:19, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> I am not a Debian developer, but I am one of the upstream
> developers of a piece of software (GCC) that would be affected
> by this proposal, and so I would like to say that I
> wholeheartedly support it. I wrote a lot of the text
Hello,
As a fool I have rushed in where angels fear to tread :-)
I sent a couple of mails to Hans Reiser and Richard Stallman (RMS)
on the issue of invariant sections (GFDL) and proper attribution (GPLv3?).
The discussion with Hans revolved on issues regarding "social" vs.
"legal" obligation. My
<事業者><送信者> JS Co.,Ltd.
港区西新橋2-22-1
JSA事業部
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
特定商取引法施行規則 受け取りを希望しない場合の連絡方法
弊社からの広告メールの配信停止を希望の場合は、
①下記ＵＲＬよりアドレスをお知らせください。
http://web-space.jp/jsa/kaijyo2.html
②件名を「配信停止」と書き換え
このメールを返信してください。
その返信元のアドレスに対する配信は停止いたします。
[EMAIL PR
16 matches
Mail list logo
