On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 05:25:02PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > 3) Would anyone be willing to help with souch a complaint?
> Send it to the FSF's gpl enforcement team.
I'm lost. Why are we arguing and going to "enforcement teams" instead
of just offering to host the Knoppix source on s
Scripsit [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
> Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Did you read the exact wording I posted? It very specifically protects
> > exactly the author's intention. Nothing more.
> What if the author's intention is that anyone do whatever they want
> wit
On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 06:28:25PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> The following licence is used on a number of LDP documents:
>
> Please freely copy and distribute (sell or give away) this document in any
> format. It's requested that corrections and/or comments be fowarded to the
> document m
On Sat, May 10, 2003 at 06:37:15PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 05:25:02PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > > 3) Would anyone be willing to help with souch a complaint?
> > Send it to the FSF's gpl enforcement team.
>
> I'm lost. Why are we arguing and going to "en
Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> He cannot do that. But his action of releasing the work under a free
> license will have the coincidental effect that it becomes impossible
> to violate the artistic integrity of the work, because the integrity
> consists exactly in the work being free.
I'm
Anthony Towns writes:
> The issue is what it costs you, not who benefits. The GPL requires
> the exact same thing -- that you make any intellectual contribution
> of your own available to others -- the only difference is that the
> GPL requires you give it to various users, and the ABC-DFL requir
Anthony Towns writes:
> On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 05:25:02PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > > 3) Would anyone be willing to help with souch a complaint?
> > Send it to the FSF's gpl enforcement team.
>
> I'm lost. Why are we arguing and going to "enforcement teams" instead
> of just offe
Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The heirs' judgement controls nothing at all. The court's does, of
> course, but the unless the court purposefully misunderstands the
> intent of the law and the author's intention [1] it will of course
> rule in favor of the author's explicit wishes.
Scripsit Thomas Bushnell, BSG
> The whole European concept of "author's rights" makes me sick;
If you insist on misunderstanding the concept in the face of sevral
attempts to explain to you that you're misunderstanding it, then it is
certainly your democratic right to let your own delusions about
Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Scripsit Thomas Bushnell, BSG
>
> > The whole European concept of "author's rights" makes me sick;
>
> If you insist on misunderstanding the concept in the face of sevral
> attempts to explain to you that you're misunderstanding it, then it is
> cert
Scripsit Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> However, even if it did, what about the "droit repentir" that was
> mentioned earlier?
I don't know about that. It is certainly not part of Danish law.
--
Henning Makholm "Der er ingen der sigter på slottet. D'herrer konger agter
Scripsit Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sec. 105. - Subject matter of copyright: United States Government works
> Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of
> the United States Government, but the United States Government is not
> precluded from receiving and h
12 matches
Mail list logo
