cupsys + libssl + libgnutls = confusion.

On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 09:22:45PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > config-scripts/cups-openssl.m4 in the cupsys source package contains the > autoconf macro cupsys uses for this purpose. Hey Adrian, I just looked at that cupsys-1.1.15/config-scripts/cups-openssl.m4 and I find no mention of Gnu

Re: New EULA of UnrealIRCd

On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 17:03, Sam Hartman wrote: > But I have encountered click-through licenses that did not require me > to agree to such conditions and that were click-throughs for DFSG > licenses. I have never found a click-through for a GPL subset. http://easysw.com/htmldoc/software.php Stri

Re: cupsys + libssl + libgnutls = confusion.

On Sun, 3 Nov 2002, Andrew Lau wrote: > On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 09:22:45PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > config-scripts/cups-openssl.m4 in the cupsys source package contains the > > autoconf macro cupsys uses for this purpose. > > Hey Adrian, Hi Andrew, > I just looked at that > cupsys-1.1

Re: off-topic discussion about permissions and promises

Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The way I read the GPL it is clearly a promise: I promise that *if* > you agree to my conditions about, e.g., not demanding an NDA from > people you distribute the code to, *then* - and not before - I will > give you my permission to copy. Yet another proble

Aspell-en license Once again.

[Please CC Me as I am not subscribed to this list] It has come to my attention that due to the discussion of a possible problem with the aspell-en licence, Aspell-en 0.50 may not get uploaded to Debian even though the issue was never really resolved. Thus I will repeat my argument once again.

Re: off-topic discussion about permissions and promises

On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 03:45:56PM +, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote: > Yet another problem with your theory: what if the author is dead? I > cannot bind my heirs with a promise (unless I do something horribly > complicated with trusts and wills) but I expect my licences to remain > valid. > > It'