cdrdao license issues show that cdrtools package is non DFSG, too?

2002-10-02 Thread Andreas Metzler
Hello, As you might have noticed cdrdao is dead at moment, it is GPLv2 but requires the included non-free library libedc_ecc. See #162788. Please take a look at http://www.mail-archive.com/cdwrite@other.debian.org/index.html#03405 before you post any answers, the short sum up is not the whole stor

Re: cdrdao license issues show that cdrtools package is non DFSG, too?

2002-10-02 Thread Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 04:25:45PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > Perhaps Debian could solve this issue once and forever by paying 250 > Euros to libedc_ecc's author, Heiko Eißfeldt? No. It's not the same to pay money to recover a proyect like Blender than to recover a little piece of soft

Re: cdrdao license issues show that cdrtools package is non DFSG, too?

2002-10-02 Thread Andreas Metzler
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 11:21:01PM +0200, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote: > On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 04:25:45PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: >> Perhaps Debian could solve this issue once and forever by paying 250 >> Euros to libedc_ecc's author, Heiko Eißfeldt? > No. > It's not the same to p

Re: cdrdao license issues show that cdrtools package is non DFSG, too?

2002-10-02 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 12:49:48AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > EUR250,- is not much money and until the replacement has been written, > Debian is without distributable CD-writing software. Paying for a licence specific to Debian is not going to help us distribute it in main, though ... -- Co

Re: cdrdao license issues show that cdrtools package is non DFSG, too?

2002-10-02 Thread Brian Ristuccia
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 12:36:00AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 12:49:48AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > EUR250,- is not much money and until the replacement has been written, > > Debian is without distributable CD-writing software. > > Paying for a licence specific to

Re: cdrdao license issues show that cdrtools package is non DFSG, too?

2002-10-02 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 07:39:17PM -0400, Brian Ristuccia wrote: > On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 12:36:00AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 12:49:48AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > > EUR250,- is not much money and until the replacement has been written, > > > Debian is without

Re: cdrdao license issues show that cdrtools package is non DFSG, too?

2002-10-02 Thread Branden Robinson
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 01:02:11AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 07:39:17PM -0400, Brian Ristuccia wrote: > > Actually, the author offered to relicense the problem code under the GPL for > > EUR250, which would not be specific to just Debian. > > Oh, sorry, I followed the f

未承諾広告※マリファナGOGO

2002-10-02 Thread kkokk
ƒ‘—MŽÒ„ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ¦L‚ðŠó–]‚µ‚È‚¢•û‚͉º‚̃AƒhƒŒƒX‚ðƒNƒŠƒbƒN‚µ‚Ä‚­‚¾‚³‚¢B [EMAIL PROTECTED] ‚±‚̃y[ƒW‚͈êTŠÔ‚ŏÁ–Å‚µ‚Ü‚·B [EMAIL PROTECTED] ‚Ç‚¤‚¼A‚±‚±‚Ö ‚ ‚Ô‚È‚¢‚­‚·‚è‚̏î•ñ‚àŽè‚É“ü‚é‚æI ¡“ú‚àƒLƒƒLƒ‚Å‚¢‚±‚¤I â‘΂Ɉ«—p‚µ‚È‚¢‚Å‚­‚¾‚³‚¢B http://goold-bb.com/ ‘åãŽs–k‹æ“°ŽR