Re: Removal of Email Address

2002-09-02 Thread David B Harris
On Sun, 1 Sep 2002 16:01:53 -0500 John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Debian does not redact its mailing list archives. > > It seems from looking at the URL posted that this is an unusual > situation -- the request is coming from someone whose e-mail address > appears on the To: line of a

Re: Removal of Email Address

2002-09-02 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
David B Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This probably just means that if they want to go after somebody, they > have to go after the person who posted the message and seek damages. What possible damages? In the United States, at least, you are allowed to say the truth. I know that in the U

Re: Removal of Email Address

2002-09-02 Thread David B Harris
On 02 Sep 2002 01:33:54 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) wrote: > David B Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > This probably just means that if they want to go after somebody, > > they have to go after the person who posted the message and seek > > damages. > > What possible dam

Re: Removal of Email Address

2002-09-02 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Sun, 01 Sep 2002, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 09:17:10PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > Michael Schultheiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > I don't know if/how well it would work for something as high traffic as > > > the Debian lists but the Nashville Linux Use

Re: Removal of Email Address

2002-09-02 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 02:08:47PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: > On Sun, 01 Sep 2002, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 09:17:10PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > > Michael Schultheiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > I don't know if/how well it would work for somethin

autoconf/Artistic compatibility

2002-09-02 Thread Stephen Stafford
Hi, I am in the process of discussions with upstream about the licensing for a new package. The package build system is autoconf based. Upstream really likes the Artistic license and would prefer to release with that. Is there any incompatibility with using the Artistic license when using an au

Re: autoconf/Artistic compatibility

2002-09-02 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 01:09:39AM +0100, Stephen Stafford wrote: > Is there any incompatibility with using the Artistic license when using an > autoconf(GPL) build system? /usr/share/doc/autoconf/copyright: As a special exception, the Free Software Foundation gives unlimited permission to copy,