Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Given that, it is my intent to develop an unambiguously DFSG-free
> alternative to the OPL and GNU FDL. Until I think of a better name,
> I guess I will call this the DFCL: the Debian Free Content License.
The DSL is a license that already exists for
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 10:22:26AM -0400, Michael Stutz wrote:
> The DSL is a license that already exists for this purpose:
> http://dsl.org/copyleft/dsl.txt
>
> It is a copyleft license that can be used for any kind of work, as
> recognized by copyright law. In particular, it has been used for
>
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 10:22:26AM -0400, Michael Stutz wrote:
>> The DSL is a license that already exists for this purpose:
>> http://dsl.org/copyleft/dsl.txt
>>
>> It is a copyleft license that can be used for any kind of work, as
>> recognized by
NEW PRODUCT ANNOUNCEMENT
From: OUTSOURCE ENG.& MFG. INC.
Sir/Madam;
This note is to inform you of new watchdog board technology for maintaining
continuous unattended operation of PC/Servers etc. that we have released for
distribution.
We are proud to announce Watchdog Control Center featurin
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 12:50:16PM -0400, Brian Sniffen wrote:
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 6. ACCEPTANCE.
> >
> > Copying, distributing or modifying the Work (including but not
> > limited to sampling from the Work in a new work) indicates
> >
Mark Purcell wrote:
> What I'm actually
> talking about is getting the licencing sorted out for the
> next release of
> hpoj to go into unstable (sid), so from that side there is no
> rush for HP
> to resolve the licence, just as long as it is being
> progressed within HP.
Hi, Mark and everyone
6 matches
Mail list logo
