-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Branden Robinson wrote:
>On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 05:51:23PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
>> Wouldn't the endorsements issue be best resolved by licensing the
>> endorsements separately from the rest of the document?
>
>Names are n
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, might not the DFCL say something like:
>
> BECAUSE THE CONTENT OF THE WORK IS FREELY MODIFIABLE BY ALL THIRD
> PARTIES, THERE IS NO WARRANTY THAT ANY REPRESENTATIONS MADE WITH IN ARE
> MADE BY, ON BEHALF OF, OR WITH THE CONSENT OF THE AUTHOR(S) OR
On Sun, Jun 16, 2002 at 02:08:56PM -0400, Jeremy Hankins wrote:
> I had a hypothetical all ready that would show how someone could use
> the sort of tunneling you were talking about to tie malicious code
> (e.g., spyware, or copy-right checking code) to something else and
> claim the result was GPL
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2002 at 02:08:56PM -0400, Jeremy Hankins wrote:
>> I had a hypothetical all ready that would show how someone could use
>> the sort of tunneling you were talking about to tie malicious code
>> (e.g., spyware, or copy-right checking cod
Jeff Licquia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-06-14 at 17:52, Walter Landry wrote:
> > Jeff Licquia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Regarding your specific concerns: The "at no charge" part was predicated
> > > on an understanding that this was one of three options. You can either
> > >
On Sun, 2002-06-16 at 20:08, Jeremy Hankins wrote:
> It'd be a bit more complicated. Say you have some dvd reading code
> whose license says that so long as it's used in conjunction with the
> functions in evil.c (which is GPL'd) the resultant work can be
> distributed under the GPL. But if you r
Jeff Licquia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If evil.c is under the GPL, then it can be modified for any purpose
> (including disabling its functionality).
For most purposes, yes, but not for *any* purpose. See section
2(c) of the GPL for details:
c) If the modified program normally reads com
On Sun, 2002-06-16 at 21:29, Walter Landry wrote:
> Jeff Licquia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That's not the problem of the distributor. If they handwrite "you can
> > get your own copy from http://foo.com/bar"; on the back of the last page,
> > they aren't required to give you network access fo
8 matches
Mail list logo
