Re: Opinion needed - included component w/o licensing doc

2002-04-28 Thread Martin Michlmayr
I'm re-opening a discussion which started at http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/debian-legal-200107/msg00026.html in July 2001. I wanted to ask for clarification because metrics is still in woody and unstable and if we cannot distribute it we should remove it before the woody release. (Note

FireBird (InterBase 6.0-beta) MPL-like license for review

2002-04-28 Thread Grzegorz Prokopski
Hello! Because I am putting more and more work into FireBird packages and they're still not in Debian - I feel the need to be sure that the packages I create will be DFSG-compliant. Of course I've read the license - 3 times, but IANAL and I want to be sure. I attached the copyright file. FireBir

Re: FireBird (InterBase 6.0-beta) MPL-like license for review

2002-04-28 Thread Walter Landry
Grzegorz Prokopski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello! > > Because I am putting more and more work into FireBird packages > and they're still not in Debian - I feel the need to be sure > that the packages I create will be DFSG-compliant. It looks fine. The verbiage about patents is not really fr