[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
> copyright protection under the Pan-American copyright treaty. (And
> it's still relevant, because there are some countries which have
> signed the Pan-American treaty, and not the Berne Convention.)
No it's not really relevant because with the
Peter Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
>
> > copyright protection under the Pan-American copyright treaty. (And
> > it's still relevant, because there are some countries which have
> > signed the Pan-American treaty, and not the Berne Convent
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
> Is there some reason you trimmed that? Just so you could make the
> same point yourself?
No point being so agressive. I read the message as you meant that what
I quoted had some relvance for the conclusion --- Which we aparently both
knows is wr
Peter Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
>
> > Is there some reason you trimmed that? Just so you could make the
> > same point yourself?
>
> No point being so agressive. I read the message as you meant that what
> I quoted had some relvance f
Scripsit [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
(Just musing - the following does not change our conclusions about
whether Debian can distribute the files in question).
> The Berne Convention generally only requires "Copyright" and a date to
> claim a copyright, and sometimes, not even that.
I
To whom it may concern,
It came to our attention that Debian have
published on one of their mailing lists ("debian-legal") our company's
confidential e-mail exchange.
This has been done without seeking our
consentand we urge Debian to remove the entry and the follow-ups from its
archive
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Anna wrote:
> It came to our attention that Debian have published on one of their
> mailing lists ("debian-legal") our company's confidential e-mail
> exchange.
This is incorrect terminology. Jorgen Hagg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
published a message, and used debian-legal to do so
Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Scripsit [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
>
> (Just musing - the following does not change our conclusions about
> whether Debian can distribute the files in question).
>
> > The Berne Convention generally only requires "Copyright" and a date
"Anna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It came to our attention that Debian have published on one of their
> mailing lists ("debian-legal") our company's confidential e-mail
> exchange.
I don't know which address in those messages you mean.
Are you complaining about the mention of the various emai
On Mar 12, Anna wrote:
> It came to our attention that Debian have published on one
> of their mailing lists ("debian-legal") our company's confidential e-mail
> exchange.
>
> This has been done without seeking our consent
> and we urge Debian to remove the entry and the follow-ups from its
>
> "Chris" == Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Chris> On Mar 12, Anna wrote:
>> It came to our attention that Debian have published on one of
>> their mailing lists ("debian-legal") our company's confidential
>> e-mail exchange.
>>
>> This has been done withou
11 matches
Mail list logo
