Hello,
We have received your request to join the Ac21Home group
at Yahoo! Groups, home to free, easy-to-use email groups. To become a
member of the Ac21Home group, please confirm your
request by replying to this message.
If you did not request, or do not want, a membership in the Ac21Home
grou
Hello,
Welcome to the Ac21Home group at Yahoo! Groups, a
free, easy-to-use email group service. Please
take a moment to review this message.
To learn more about the Ac21Home group, please visit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Ac21Home
To start sending messages to members of this group, simply
> "David" == David Starner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David> Apparently, the maintainer of Glut hasn't been changed yet.
David> So I'll cc you directly. (Sorry for the extra copies, James.)
David> On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 02:41:21PM -0600, David Starner wrote:
>> reopen 131997
This one time, at band camp, David Starner wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 02:41:21PM -0600, David Starner wrote:
>> reopen 131997
>> thanks
>>
>> >* GLUT headers and examples are actually DFSG free,
>> > see debian/copyright (Closes: #131997)
>>
>> and debian/copyright says
>>
>> NOT
This one time, at band camp, Sam Hartman wrote:
>I think this license is sufficiently obviously DFSG non-free that
>whoever claimed it was free and closed the bug should spend some time
>reviewing the DFSG before continuing to maintain packages.
I think that you have sufficiently obviously not rea
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > The GPL says you only have to _offer_ them the source. If they
> > want it on physical media you can tell them to bring a floppy to
> > office hours; otherwise just put it on a web site.
>
> That's not sufficient according to my reading. There are
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 20020213T133738-0800, Walter Landry wrote:
> > In fact, it seems like the GPL is better worded
> > for this sort of thing.
>
> I would advice against anyone using the GPL for documentation.
> For example, if I print and photocopy a GPL'd docum
Hello,
We have received a request from you to unsubscribe from the
Ac21Home group. Please confirm your request by
replying to this message. If you do not wish to unsubscribe from
Ac21Home, please ignore this message.
Regards,
Yahoo! Groups Customer Care
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject
Hello,
This is to inform you that your request to unsubscribe from
Ac21Home has been completed.
Regards,
Yahoo! Groups Customer Care
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 08:57:22PM +1100, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
> debian/copyright also includes upstreams response to my queries, which you
> conveniently failed to include. In that mail, Mark Kilgard makes it quite
> clear that the user certainly has a right to modify his code.
I'm sorry; the
On 20020215T115256+, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
> I would have thought that in this situation you could get away with
> putting the source on a web site and telling the students to download
> it within a few days. That way they have been given the source.
No, you couldn't. (Unless the copyri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Does the following liscense fall under the Debian Social Contract such
that it could be distributed in main? If not, how could this package be
distributed with Debian?
http://www.vovida.com/About/license.html
- --
Warren
GPG Fingerprint: 30C8 BDF
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If you reply to my message, please CC me as I am not a subscriber to
the list.
http://www.vovida.com/About/license.html
- --
Warren
GPG Fingerprint: 30C8 BDF1 B133 14CB 832F 2C5D 99A1 A19F 559D 9E88
GPG Public Key @ http://www.cbu.edu/~wturkal/wt
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 10:51:36PM -0600, Warren Turkal wrote:
> Does the following liscense fall under the Debian Social Contract such
> that it could be distributed in main? If not, how could this package be
> distributed with Debian?
>
> http://www.vovida.com/About/license.html
I don't see w
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 11:40:17PM -0600, David Starner wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 10:51:36PM -0600, Warren Turkal wrote:
> > Does the following liscense fall under the Debian Social Contract such
> > that it could be distributed in main? If not, how could this package be
> > distributed wi
15 matches
Mail list logo
