I may be way out of my depth here, but here goes anyway
I've written and packaged eurospeak (www.karl.jorgensen.com/eurospeak),
and I'd like to include a "eurospeakised" version of the GNU Public
License (version 2).
But the GPL-2 does not allow for modifications of the license itself. It
doe
Would it be legal to use the GPL, and say "this program is licensed under
the GPL with the following exeptions [list of changes]"?
Are your changes more permissive (if so, do it like Guile did) or more
restrictive?
Karl wrote:
> But the GPL-2 does not allow for modifications of the license itse
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 01:48:08PM +, Sunnanvind wrote:
> Karl wrote:
> > But the GPL-2 does not allow for modifications of the license itself.
> > It
> > does allow modifications of the "program", but not the license.
> >
> > As far as I can see, my choices are:
>
> Would it be legal to use
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 02:25:21PM +, Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 01:48:08PM +, Sunnanvind wrote:
> > Karl wrote:
> > > But the GPL-2 does not allow for modifications of the license itself.
> > > It
> > > does allow modifications of the "program", but not the license.
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 01:22:56PM +, Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
> I've written and packaged eurospeak (www.karl.jorgensen.com/eurospeak),
> and I'd like to include a "eurospeakised" version of the GNU Public
> License (version 2).
Why would you like to do it? Just as an example, or as the actu
5 matches
Mail list logo