On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 03:42:05PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 12:29:12PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > Shaya Potter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > The FSF wants things to be called GNU/Linux, because its a GNU system
> > > with a linux kernel. The sam
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 01:03:43PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > It seems to fair to ask the FSF which principle they value more highly
> > in this case.
>
> There is no conflict, so there is no need to weight principles against each
> other.
Some people think there is.
I continue to think
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 02:59:00PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 02:00:24AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > With a limit of 8,000 or 10,000 bytes, the GNU Emacs Manual would easily
> > fail. The GNU Manifesto itself easily blows past those limits.
>
> Then it would've b
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 10:44:21PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > or are we trying to make emacs non-free,
> No, but it is also not my intent to author some decree that specific
> works shall never be regarded as non-free.
No one's talking about how the DFSG might change later, it's how it m
4 matches
Mail list logo
