[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Branden Robinson) writes:
> Why shouldn't the State of California be able to assert its jurisdiction
> over anyone in the world in civil matters? (You can't extradite someone
> on a non-criminal complaint, AFAIK.)
Not quite... at this point, the question is narrower: Why shoul
On 13-Oct-2001 Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 02:23:54PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>> The problem is that it is hard to associate a name to a font. In Debian we
>> have the copyright file, but elsewhere there is no such requirement. This
>> is
>> why digital artworks o
On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 11:00:25PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> of course it is, but people do it all the time. To code, to art, to
> practically anything. "Hey I got this off the Net it must be free".
>
> My point was that we have a policy requiring the copyright to be included in a
> kn
On Sat, Oct 13, 2001 at 01:24:12AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Every font file format with which I am familiar permits inclusion of
> copyright data. Even simple ones like BDF, which, being capable of
> representing only bitmaps, you can't assert copyright on anyway.
I've read that in countr
> "Mark" == Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mark> I don't think that the concerns are about the extra clauses
Mark> that Blackdown added in their supplemental license. They
Mark> could be a bit more clear as has already been noted. It is a
Mark> bit unclear how "Linux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[there is no indication in the headers as to whether Stephen wishes to
be CCd or not. To be safe I am CCing him]
On Sunday 14 Oct 2001 2:34 am, Stephen Zander wrote:
>
> Mark> The other concern mentioned on debian-legal by Stephen
>
> Mark>
6 matches
Mail list logo
