On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 05:55:59PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> yes public domain essentially gives all possible rights with no
> restrictions.
I keep hearing, though I have not had the opportunity to verify this
with a Real Lawyer(tm), that public domain has one drawback; you can't
attach
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Branden Robinson wrote:
> I keep hearing, though I have not had the opportunity to verify this
> with a Real Lawyer(tm), that public domain has one drawback; you can't
> attach a no-warranty statement to it.
I'm no lawyer and had not contact to US or british ones. But it woul
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 04:52:37AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> I keep hearing, though I have not had the opportunity to verify this
> with a Real Lawyer(tm), that public domain has one drawback; you can't
> attach a no-warranty statement to it.
US Geological Survey seems to have no problem di
Scripsit Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I keep hearing, though I have not had the opportunity to verify this
> with a Real Lawyer(tm), that public domain has one drawback; you can't
> attach a no-warranty statement to it.
It may mean (no: it does mean) that you cannot force other people t
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 01:31:25PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
> So the situation would be something like:
>
> 1. A writes software, contributes it to the public domain and
>distributes it with a warranty disclaimer.
>
> 2. B downloads software from A's site, strips off the warranty
>di
junkbuster ( 2.0.2-0.1 from testing ) seems to have a licence problem in
/etc/junkbuster/imagelist, which is used to determine which blocked pages
that are in fact images, and should be replaced by an empty image.
The rest of Junkbuster is GPL, but this file starts with
#
# This is /etc/junkbuste
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Per Eric Rosén wrote:
> # No distribution of this list without acknowledgement of the author(s).
> # No selling of thist list without prior written agreement.
Replying to myself ... of cource this is perfectly OK for non-free. Just a
wrong parsing. But it does not give any ex
Scripsit Per Eric Rosén <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Per Eric Rosén wrote:
> > # No distribution of this list without acknowledgement of the author(s).
> > # No selling of thist list without prior written agreement.
> Replying to myself ... of cource this is perfectly OK for non-fre
[please cc me]
David Starner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If there's an exception for non-topical chapters, then why not for
> standards?
Because these are completely different things, see below.
> A non-topical chapter is more likely to get out of date than a
> standard, which by design is in
Hi,
I've just discovered that the company EverStore created a software with the
name replicator with some functionnality similar to my Debian package.
Their press release (http://www.everstor.com/press/june6-01.html) is dated
og june 2001 whereas replicator is on SourceForge since 09/2001.
I'
> > Are there packages in non-free that have special permission for
> > Debian? Do you know any of their names? I was worried about some
> > practical problems, but am willing to be swayed by precedent.
>
> I believe Netscape 4.x is a prime example: Upstream provides binaries
> only. Only AOL-
> Scripsit Per Eric Rosén <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Per Eric Rosén wrote:
>
> > > # No distribution of this list without acknowledgement of the author(s).
> > > # No selling of thist list without prior written agreement.
>
> > Replying to myself ... of cource this is perfectly
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 02:44:50PM -0700, Walter Landry wrote:
> So, are there any other packages that specifically mention Debian?
ines.
crafty has something comparable.
But I'm not sure why an example is needed. non-free is for
software which we can legally distribute but which doesn't
meet t
13 matches
Mail list logo
