David Starner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Silly, philosophical point: if the author is dead, then there is a
> > greatly reduced risk of the author coming back and "clarifying" the
> > licence, so presumably you can interpret the licence more broadly in
> > that case.
>
> Of course, you've got the p
On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 09:16:12AM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
> A spouse might have some kind of special authority, but a random
> descendent can't claim to have a more authoritative knowledge of the
> author's intentions than anyone else in the world, so there's no
> reason anyone should t
2 matches
Mail list logo
