Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On the other hand, if we can't modify, what purpose is served
> by us distributing it at all? It's available from the Intel
> website, right? It's just a file that gets installed by the loader,
> right? There's no integration issue.
There are two advantages
On 01-Jun-01, 16:02 (CDT), Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [No one (other than Thomas Bushnell) is advocating that the microcode
> be distributed under the DFSG.]
Well, I think I would *advocate* that it be distributed under the
DFSG. I suspect that the benefits of doing so are perhaps l
On 01-Jun-01, 04:41 (CDT), Giacomo Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Note that Intel's claims as to what you can and can't do with the
> > microcode aren't necessarily legally binding.
>
> I don't undertand this sentence.
The license cannot forbid actions that are
3 matches
Mail list logo
