Anthony Towns writes:
> It's not able to be modified, it's not going to be a part of Debian
> anyway. What's your point?
Ok, perhaps I misunderstood. Please forgive me...I was assuming that
it was being discussed here precisely because it might be part of
Debian. What exactly is its current st
Giacomo Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> But there is annother difficult. To write BIOS we use assembler because
> we have much control to hardware, to write microcode I think they don't
> use any language, to be more direct. They write (maybe) directly the bit
> or byte. Thus there exists only bi
Anthony Towns wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 10:13:22AM +0200, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
> > The license (for non-FREE section):
> > / Copyright Intel Corporation, 1995, 96, 97, 98, 99,
> > 2000, 2001.
> > /
> > / These microcode updates are distributed for the sole
> > purpose of
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 11:41:26AM +0200, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
> Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 10:13:22AM +0200, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
> > > The license (for non-FREE section):
> > > / These microcode updates are distributed for the sole
> > > purpose of
> > > /
I've created an online community called "Have you been hacked by f*ck
PoizonBOx?".
http://www.delphi.com/PoizonBOx/start/
Please join the discussion!
With the message board, you can view discussion folders quickly in the
left-hand column and read up to 20 messages at a time. You can even atta
Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Maybe, but there would be very little practical benefit from having
> DFSG-free microcode. Most of the arguments for free software don't
> really apply to microcode. I work for a company that designs
> microprocessors, so I might be interested in
Um.. just to reiterate what's going on here:
For Debian to distribute the microcode at all, we need permission to
distribute it[1].
For Debian to distribute the microcode *as a part of Debian*, we'd need
the microcode to meet the DFSG.
[No one (other than Thomas Bushnell) is advocating that the
Hi,
I am working on a package for libfpx - the FlashPIX toolkit. I'm not sure
about the license of the library though.
Is it DFSG free?
Regards,
Filip
PS. Please CC me on replies, I am not subscribed to this list.
--
I only get 13M/sec off my wide LVD 10k rpm scsi drive
well, obviously you
> Hi,
>
> I am working on a package for libfpx - the FlashPIX toolkit. I'm not sure
> about the license of the library though.
> Is it DFSG free?
>
> Regards,
>
> Filip
It looks like the BSD with the (obnoxious) advertising clause. It
also has the choice of law clause. It is DFSG free and can
"Thomas Bushnell, BSG" wrote:
>
> Giacomo Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > 2) It is difficult to say that microcode is a program:
> >there are surelly many entry points (one per instruction),
> >many exit point. Instruction are executed partly in parallel,...
> >It is too h
10 matches
Mail list logo
