All right, this is getting silly. I just talked to my brother who got
a letter to the editor published in the Economist. He didn't sign a
single thing, and there are no disclaimers. The Economist is based in
England, but it has offices in many countries. That subjects them to
almost every conce
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 11:12:34PM -0400, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
> On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 10:10:30PM -0400, Brian Ristuccia wrote:
> >
> > Choice 3 is best. People who live in countries where the use of cryptography
> > is restricted are probably subject to being arbitrarily jailed or murdered
>
Hi,
I am converting all of my system to ISO-8859-15 and I notice that just
the "fixed" font has a 8859-15. It would be great to have standard
fonts such as Times, Helvetica, ... be compatible with this encoding.
Now, it seems that the fonts coming with XFree86 are copyrighted by
Adobe. So what a
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 04:58:21AM -0400, Wolfgang Sourdeau wrote:
> I am converting all of my system to ISO-8859-15 and I notice that just
> the "fixed" font has a 8859-15. It would be great to have standard
> fonts such as Times, Helvetica, ... be compatible with this encoding.
[...]
> Now, it se
"Marcelo E. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Viral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I would like clarify the reason for lame not being included in the debian
> > archives, not even non-US.
>
> http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/unable-to-package
>
> IIRC your questions are addresse
> "Branden" == Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1) All of the fonts in the xfree86 source package are freely licensed.
> (N.B., this is not the case with the upstream XFree86 source tarballs.)
What are the fonts that have been removed ?
> 2) Markus Kuhn has, I believe, extended
6 matches
Mail list logo
