On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 07:10:40PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> There are two advertising related clauses in the traditional BSD license.
> One says "you can't use the author's names to hock your derived wares",
I think you mean "hawk":
From Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913) [web191
Branden Robinson wrote:
> "Hock" would appear to be a slang word of more recent origin that most
> public-domain dictionaries, sadly. If I hock my guitar, it means I go to
> the pawnbroker's and use it as collateral for a short-term loan.
Well, it's in wordnet:
v : give as a guarantee [syn: {pa
Where would a package with no license at all fit in in the distro?
it is given with source, but no copyrights, or license, when I asked the author
if it was licensed he said this:
"There's indeed no copyright or license on it, so you are free to use it."
should that be an assumed public domain?
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 12:43:45PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Where would a package with no license at all fit in in the distro?
> it is given with source, but no copyrights, or license, when I asked the
> author if it was licensed he said this:
>
> "There's indeed no copyright or license
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> [I'm probably repeating myself, but this is for the benefit of debian-legal
> readers and may help to shorten discussion]
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 16:10:39 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > could someone please tell me if this patch:
> > - contains
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 12:26:25AM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> Branden Robinson wrote:
> > "Hock" would appear to be a slang word of more recent origin that most
> > public-domain dictionaries, sadly. If I hock my guitar, it means I go to
> > the pawnbroker's and use it as collateral for a short-ter
6 matches
Mail list logo
