Scripsit John Galt
> Basically, it all boils down to: where this
> contract fails, ALL contracts fail,
No. It says that if I commit any crime whatsoever (e.g. bicycling at night
without the lights on), then I am breaking the contract that lets me use
the software. This does *NOT* apply to all oth
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, David Starner wrote:
> The DFSG is designed to be an objective standard. This clause in
> particular is designed so people don't subjectively chose who
> they like and who they don't.
I also think so about objectivity. But you can overract.
For example, i could get mad and
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Henning Makholm wrote:
> No. It says that if I commit any crime whatsoever (e.g. bicycling at night
> without the lights on), then I am breaking the contract that lets me use
> the software.
I may quote: "Any use of analog which is illegal under "
So your example does not ma
Scripsit "Bernhard R. Link" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Henning Makholm wrote:
> > No. It says that if I commit any crime whatsoever (e.g. bicycling
> > at night without the lights on), then I am breaking the contract
> > that lets me use the software.
> I may quote: "Any use of a
Scripsit "Bernhard R. Link" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > (But please: Not because of "crime" as "field of endavour".
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 01:08:18AM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
> It is, whether you like it or not.
Actually, there is a point related to what Bernhard is saying.
At least in the U.S
5 matches
Mail list logo
