Re: QT Designer _NOT_ under QPL.

2000-08-17 Thread Joseph Carter
On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 09:18:45AM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > > > > Troll Tech clearly does have the ability to grant implicit permission > > > > for > > > > their code and anyone on this list should concede that this software has > > > > no legal problems. > > > > > > Huh? Here you say

Re: IMAPD license problem?

2000-08-17 Thread Richard Stallman
I've been told that you, or someone working with you, has threatened to sue the FSF (Free Software Foundation) for distributing modified copies of IMAPD. I should point out that what I told you was not this. I said that the U of W threatened to sue us if we distributed a modified vers

Re: QT Designer _NOT_ under QPL.

2000-08-17 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Joseph Carter wrote: > On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 09:18:45AM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > > The way I'm reading what you wrote is like so: > > > > - Troll Tech releasing GPLed code that links to Qt is legal > > (because implicit permission is granted). > > - But it's against Debian policy to

Re: IMAPD license problem?

2000-08-17 Thread Raul Miller
On Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 04:32:16AM -0600, Richard Stallman wrote: > I've been told that you, or someone working with you, has threatened to > sue the FSF (Free Software Foundation) for distributing modified copies > of IMAPD. > > I should point out that what I told you was not this. I