On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 05:24:14PM -0700, Jonathan Morace wrote:
> >Majordomo is *not* open source software. It doesn't fulfil the
> >conditions of the Open Source Definition. In particular, as this
> >security problem has been noticed and Debian is unable to fix it and
> >distribute a fixed vers
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 05:24:14PM -0700, Jonathan Morace wrote:
> >Majordomo is *not* open source software. It doesn't fulfil the
> >conditions of the Open Source Definition. In particular, as this
> >security problem has been noticed and Debian is unable to fix it and
> >distribute a fixed vers
In general, "trade dress" is a fairly weak concept. Owens-Corning has
been held, for example, to have a protectable right to make fiberglass
insulation in a distinctive pink color because there is no natural
association with that color and construction material. On the other hand,
John Deere has
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 03:34:37AM -0500, Ashley Clark wrote:
> I intend to package malsync, it is a command-line utility program to
> synchronize a Pilot with the AvantGo (or other) MAL servers.
>
> License: MPL 1.0
> -- I seem to remember that there was some kind of problem with the 1.0
> v
I just started looking at Sphinx, and I'd remembered a bit of discussion
about the license CMU used. I did a mailing list search on "sphinx" just
now back the past 4 quarters of the archive, and the only thing that
turned up was that section 4 of the license passed the Open Source
guidelines but w
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 09:01:04PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I just started looking at Sphinx, and I'd remembered a bit of discussion
> about the license CMU used. I did a mailing list search on "sphinx" just
> now back the past 4 quarters of the archive, and the only thing that
> turned
6 matches
Mail list logo
