Re: Uploaded mirror 2.9-13slink15 (source all) to master

On Thu, 13 Jan 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >* Adopt potato postinst which applies patches at installation time to be > in line with somewhat peculiar mirror license. I don't want to be nitpick, but if patches have to be applied at installation time, then it's non-free. Am I missing an

Re: Uploaded mirror 2.9-13slink15 (source all) to master

Dirk> * Adopt potato postinst which applies patches at installation time Dirk> to be in line with somewhat peculiar mirror license. Santiago> I don't want to be nitpick, but if patches have to be applied at Santiago> installation time, then it's non-free. I think I disagree, so does th

Free World Licence possible improved structure.

Marc and others, I've had an idea for a new Free World Licence structure. First, I backtrack to non-contract structure. So it would have a structure similar to the GPL. Second, I include a clause like this: You may not copy the Module onto a non-free platform. However, as an exception, you

RHTVision and SETEdit, non-free? are they distributable at all? Anything that can be done about?

Hello. First of all I want to explain what RHTVision and SETEdit are, RHTVision is a TUI (Text User Interface) library, SETEdit is a feature rich text editor that uses the RHTVision library. The RHTVision library source code is based from the source code of the Turbo Vision

Re: From Corel on the EULA

In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Zygo Blaxell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >2. Some mailing lists restrict posting privileges to email addresses >that are subscribed or registered with the mailing list only. Most >have restrictions about the sender's domain name--and those that don't >have subscribers that