Yes, indeed, and Kudos to Arphic and also to CLE, the Chinese Linux
Extension Team in Taiwan
Can you tell me how to contact this team? I would like to talk with
them, and explain to them that what they are extending is the GNU
system, not Linux. This work has nothing to do with Linux at
Hi Richard!
On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 06:55:16PM -0700, Richard Stallman wrote:
> Yes, indeed, and Kudos to Arphic and also to CLE, the Chinese Linux
> Extension Team in Taiwan
>
> Can you tell me how to contact this team? I would like to talk with
> them, and explain to them that what the
On Mon, Dec 06, 1999 at 02:37:35AM +0100, Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote:
> 2. Debian's packages quality is very inequal. We cant force Debian to
> make Quality Standards, and if maintainer of some package dont think
> this is a bug, we can do nothing.
you've got to be joking!
one of the best things
On Mon, Dec 06, 1999 at 01:56:31AM -0500, Caspian wrote:
> I'd just like to add my two cents (they're rather big...perhaps
> they're two dollars?) to this little discussion.
> [342 line rant deleted]
i think you exaggerate just a little :)
some points that need to be made in response (in random
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 08:23:35PM -0600, Philip Thiem wrote:
> My 2 cents:
>
> If you want it easier for newibes or you want a nice GUI. Consider the
> following
This is very wrong to think that what all newbies want is GUI for everything.
They want browser, they want word processor, they want s
On Thu, Dec 09, 1999 at 10:20:05PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 06, 1999 at 01:56:31AM -0500, Caspian wrote:
>
> > I'd just like to add my two cents (they're rather big...perhaps
> > they're two dollars?) to this little discussion.
>
> > [342 line rant deleted]
>
> i think you exagg
Hi,
Now I'm talking with the author of jcode.pl(libjcode-perl, currently in
non-free) about changing its license. Recently he gave me the draft of new
license for it. It goes like:
;# Use and redistribution for ANY PURPOSE are granted as long as all
;# copyright notices are retained. Redistr
On Thu, 9 Dec 1999, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 06, 1999 at 01:56:31AM -0500, Caspian wrote:
>
> > I'd just like to add my two cents (they're rather big...perhaps
> > they're two dollars?) to this little discussion.
>
> > [342 line rant deleted]
>
> i think you exaggerate just a little :
On 7 Dec 99, at 23:10, Richard Makin wrote:
> It's an interesting situation, because in countries like Poland you are
> explicitly granted with the right to deasemble the program, even if ELA
> states the opposite - the Polish law overrules it.
I am a Czech lawyer (Czech republic is neighbor to P
On Fri, Dec 10, 1999 at 12:07:28AM +0900, Masayuki Hatta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Now I'm talking with the author of jcode.pl(libjcode-perl, currently in
> non-free) about changing its license. Recently he gave me the draft of new
> license for it. It goes like:
>
> ;# Use and redistribution for ANY
On 09-Dec-1999 Masayuki Hatta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Now I'm talking with the author of jcode.pl(libjcode-perl, currently in
> non-free) about changing its license. Recently he gave me the draft of new
> license for it. It goes like:
>
> ;# Use and redistribution for ANY PURPOSE are granted as lon
On Thu, Dec 09, 1999 at 03:21:44PM -0600, David Starner wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 1999 at 12:07:28AM +0900, Masayuki Hatta wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Now I'm talking with the author of jcode.pl(libjcode-perl, currently in
> > non-free) about changing its license. Recently he gave me the draft of new
12 matches
Mail list logo
