Excuse me for reopening a month-old thread, but browsing the archives I
thought I had something of interest (email from Knuth, no less! albeit a bit
old) to add to this one.
Mike Goldman wrote:
>"J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 11, 1999 at 21:37:13 -0800, Bruce Perens wrote:
>> > Ther
Tomasz Wegrzanowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 06, 1999 at 10:53:20PM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
> > Tomasz Wegrzanowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > What is wrong with picasm license ?
> This is non-free license. But why do I have /usr/doc/picasm/copyright:
The license
I thought rather about a set of tools that put together will make
a web browser. This will be :
That sounds like the Unix design approach. I tend to think that this
approach would be more work, and would result in something not as easy
to use.
Part I dont know how will be done is jav
On Tue, 7 Dec 1999, Joey Hess wrote:
> Caspian wrote:
> > In most cases, I'd bet dollars to doughnuts that those who "buy" modern
> > commercial GNU/Linux dists (which are often laced with tons of non-free
> > code, usually-- as in the case of Red Hat-- completely unsegregated from
> > free code,
Richard,
two news which may interest you.
.) Arphic Inc, a Taiwanese font company, has released four Chinese
TrueType fonts, two covering the GB character set, and the other
two having Big 5 character set. The licence (which you can find
attached, justified to fit the screen better) is
Caspian wrote:
> In most cases, I'd bet dollars to doughnuts that those who "buy" modern
> commercial GNU/Linux dists (which are often laced with tons of non-free
> code, usually-- as in the case of Red Hat-- completely unsegregated from
> free code, and often part of the base system)
99.9% FUD. R
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 99-12-05 at 20:46 Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote:
>On Sat, Dec 04, 1999 at 10:18:33PM -0500, Jeff Teunissen wrote:
>> Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote:
>> >
>> > Are licenses where reverse engeneering is prohibiten invalid ?
>>
>> Yes, because reverse-engineeri
> .) Arphic Inc, a Taiwanese font company, has released four Chinese
>TrueType fonts, two covering the GB character set, and the other
>two having Big 5 character set. The licence (which you can find
>attached, justified to fit the screen better) is a slightly
>modified GPL which f
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 06:28:38PM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
>
>
> The license you quote does seem free to me. Apparently it is new
> with version 1.6 of picasm. The one in slink still has the non-free
> license I found.
>
> The Debian changelog provides some clues as to why it is still in
>
9 matches
Mail list logo
