Qhull's licence

1999-11-15 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
I am considering to package Qhull, available at http://www.geom.umn.edu/software/qhull/, but I am wondering whether its licence is DFSG-compliant. Here is its COPYING.txt file: - Qhull, Copyright (c) 1993

Re: Qhull's licence

1999-11-15 Thread David Starner
On Mon, Nov 15, 1999 at 01:16:48AM +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > > I am considering to package Qhull, available at > http://www.geom.umn.edu/software/qhull/, but I am wondering whether its > licence is DFSG-compliant. Here is its COPYING.txt file: Why do you think it might not be? > via ano

Re: Qhull's licence

1999-11-15 Thread Bruce Perens
Looks fine to me. Bruce

mutt no longer in non-us?

1999-11-15 Thread Brian Ristuccia
I just recently noticed that mutt is no longer in non-us. What has changed that allows us to distribute mutt from the US to people outside of the US despite the fact that mutt is capable of integrating with strong encryption software and thereby capable of performing strong encryption on messages

Re: mutt no longer in non-us?

1999-11-15 Thread Bruce Perens
From: Brian Ristuccia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > What has changed that allows us to distribute mutt from the US to people > outside of the US despite the fact that mutt is capable of integrating with > strong encryption software and thereby capable of performing strong > encryption on messages it sends?

Re: mutt no longer in non-us?

1999-11-15 Thread Chris Lawrence
On Nov 15, Brian Ristuccia wrote: > I just recently noticed that mutt is no longer in non-us. > > What has changed that allows us to distribute mutt from the US to people > outside of the US despite the fact that mutt is capable of integrating with > strong encryption software and thereby capable