[please CC mean on responses, I am not subscribed to the list.)
This is the full license of the wdg-html-reference package:
: Copyright:
:
: This document will discuss information regarding the manner in which WDG
: offline references may be distributed. Before we begin, please note
: that
: yo
> Yes, of course it is. But the license really only applies to that portion
> of the derivative that is your work. The term "relicensing" implies
> otherwise, which is why I object to it.
why does it imply that? a licence is merely a contract; i can slap any
licence i want on a public domain work
50 hours ago, I wrote:
> How about:
>
> "You may link this software with XForms (Copyright (C) by
> T.C. Zhao and Mark Overmars) and distribute the resulting
> binary, under the restrictions in clause 3 of the GPL, even
> though the resulting binary is not, as a whole, covered by
I think it's reasonable, as long as 1) you're the copyright holder,
and 2) the result goes in "contrib" or "non-free" and not "main".
Thanks
Bruce
Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> > How about:
> >
> > "You may link this software with XForms (Copyright (C) by
> > T.C. Zhao and Mark Overmars) and distribute the resulting
> > binary, under the restrictions in clause 3 of the GPL, even
> > though the resulting binary is not, as a whole
"Jaldhar H. Vyas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : * Any HTML changes must not generate HTML errors according to
> :an SGML-based HTML validator e.g.:
> :WDG HTML Validator (http://www.htmlhelp.com//tools/validator/)
> :W3C HTML Validation Service (http://validator.w3.org/";) or an X
On 10 Jun 1999, Henning Makholm wrote:
> I'm not going to interfere with the discussion whether the DFSG should
> apply to mere documentation, but if we assume it should, then the
> quoted clause is indeed non-free.
>
It is mere documentation and I personally think different rules should
apply t
Bruce Perens wrote:
> I think it's reasonable, as long as 1) you're the copyright holder,
You're referring to my repackaging the upstream tar balls?
Yes, I'm doing it as a favour to the upstream author who will
upload them.
> and 2) the result goes in "contrib" or "non-free" and not "main".
Th
I'm sure you all get asked this a lot, so please forgive me but
this is my first step into the open software world.
I'm curious about using GPL'ed software in a supporting role for
non-GLP software. Let's say YoyoDyne takes the Debian installer
verbatum and uses it to install the next ve
9 matches
Mail list logo
