Re: Forking and relicensing issues (different)

1999-05-13 Thread Jonathan P Tomer
actually, be is not violating a licence. the bootloader/kernel use gnu malloc, which is lgpl'ed. they use gnu termcap and crypt as well, but only in telnet and top and they do publish the sources there. --p. "For a price I'd do about anything, except pull the trigger: for that I'd need a pretty go

Re: Bug#37599: jdk1.1: no permission to distribute

1999-05-13 Thread Stephen Zander
> "Richard" == Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Richard> Package: jdk1.1 Version: 1.1.7v1a-2 Severity: grave Richard> According to its license, we're not allowed to distribute Richard> this package at all: (caps mine) Richard> 1. Limited License Grant. Sun grants

Re: Bug#37599: jdk1.1: no permission to distribute

1999-05-13 Thread Richard Braakman
Stephen Zander wrote: > > "Richard" == Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > However, the > > JDK Version 1.1.x Internal Noncommercial Use Source License1 of 4 > Nov 10, 1998 > > which I have signed states, in part [...] Thanks for the information, this clears up a lot. > There