The quick glance I gave this didn't seem to uncover any problems, but
since it is long and convoluted I figured I'd post it here to get some
more eyes on it.
OpenXML Public License (Draft)
1. Definitions.
1.1. ``Contributor'' means each entity that creates or
contributes to the creatio
James LewisMoss writes:
> The quick glance I gave this [OpenXML Public License (Draft)] didn't seem
> to uncover any problems, but since it is long and convoluted I figured
> I'd post it here to get some more eyes on it.
Looks like the GPL rewritten by a lawyer being paid by the word. I'd say
it
> > The quick glance I gave this [OpenXML Public License (Draft)] didn't seem
> > to uncover any problems, but since it is long and convoluted I figured
> > I'd post it here to get some more eyes on it.
>
> Looks like the GPL rewritten by a lawyer being paid by the word. I'd say
> it is free, and
Jonathan P Tomer writes:
> hm, does the gpl require the distributor of a derived work to give
> licence to all applicable patents they own?
No.
> i think that's a nice feature.
I agree.
> the legal file requirement is potentially problematic (since it forces a
> particular name)
I Think it is
4 matches
Mail list logo
