Re: licence of LDP

1999-04-14 Thread John Hasler
Henning Makholm writes: > However, as far as contract law is concerned, I'd think I could validly > offer you the privilege of making partial copies of my work, in return > for a promise not to add anything to said partial copies? Right, but I think you need to be clear about it. Saying "no deriv

Re: Corel (was Re: your mail)

1999-04-14 Thread Fredrick Paul Eisele
Ben Pfaff wrote: > > Jeff Noxon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >Although I certainly don't mind the suggestion of Corel getting one >(many?) developer accounts, I'm not certain I like the idea of voting >rights or access to -private... Just my $0.02. > > What's to stop individual Cor

Re: Corel (was Re: your mail)

1999-04-14 Thread Ben Pfaff
Fredrick Paul Eisele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ben Pfaff wrote: > > Jeff Noxon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >Although I certainly don't mind the suggestion of Corel getting one >(many?) developer accounts, I'm not certain I like the idea of voting >rights or a

Re: Modification of reference material

1999-04-14 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
Hi, On Sun, Apr 11, 1999 at 09:23:23PM +, Arnoud 'Galactus' Engelfriet wrote: > The problem is that we don't want modified versions of the reference > materials floating around. We've had some bad experiences with people who > inserted their own ad banners, or even modified the text to "correc