Santiago Vila quotes:
> Permission to modify the software is granted, but not the right to
> distribute the modified code. Modifications are to be distributed as
> patches to released version.
And writes:
> Appended to this, in the copyright file, there is an email from the
> Debian maintai
Henning Makholm writes:
> 1: is a vaguely formulated emailed statement of intention legally
> binding enough to be OK for the DFSG.
> 2: should we interpret the email as being "specific to Debian" simply
> because the author made his statement in the context of a request
> for clarification
[ migrated from -vote to -legal; ionutz, i've cc'ed you too because i
don't know if you're on the list. ]
> About modifying the logos now:
> I am curious on one thing: if I can modify the liberal one, I can make
> it look like the official one. For the swirl: I remove the botle and
> make the swi
I'd like to seek a license change for xwatch, xplot and xcolmix
(currently GPL) for something like this:
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
Free Software Foundation; either ve
Dear Readers.
I am currently packaging the cdindex client and server program from
cdindex.org.
While doing this I stumbled over this in the source:
/* NIST Secure Hash Algorithm */
/* heavily modified by Uwe Hollerbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED] edu> */
/* from Peter C. Gutmann's implementation as fou
Jens Ritter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
While doing this I stumbled over this in the source:
/* NIST Secure Hash Algorithm */
/* heavily modified by Uwe Hollerbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED] edu> */
/* from Peter C. Gutmann's implementation as found in */
/* Applied Cryptography by Bruce
I just saw the item on slashdot.org that the Free Software foundation has
updated its definition of free software
(http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/free-sw.html). The changes seem to have
come out of RMS's recent essay (which I swear I read on-line, but I can't
find for the life of me) that appeared
> RMS's recent essay (which I swear I read on-line, but I can't
> find for the life of me) that appeared in "Open Sources".
There it is.
http://www.fsf.org/gnu/thegnuproject.html
Hi,
I maintain some HTML and CSS references in HTML and other formats [1]. The
current usage guidelines [2] prevent inclusion of the references in the
main Debian distribution, but I would like to correct this by issuing new
guidelines for using the references.
I don't mind having the references
On Wed, Apr 07, 1999 at 01:52:59PM -0400, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
> I just saw the item on slashdot.org that the Free Software foundation has
> updated its definition of free software
> (http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/free-sw.html). The changes seem to have
> come out of RMS's recent essay (which I s
> I am now wondering (Well, I am not sure), if I now have to put the
> package into non-us or if I can put I into the normal archive.
Depends on what the code does. Everything labeled "Secure" is not
cryptography.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
11 matches
Mail list logo
