Previously Darren Benham wrote:
> * You are not allowed to use "Debian" in a way that the Debian Project
> considers detrimental to its reputation.
* Debian reserves the right to revoke the permission to use the term
`Debian', provided there is a good reason
A bit vague, but it captures the a
Previously Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > 4) program A, which can load library B on demand
>
> If it did not include any source before: No. If it included header files or
> anything: Yes.
>
> If it just can load shared object code on demand, and do something useful
> with it, No. (take objdump for e
On Sun, Mar 21, 1999 at 02:46:00AM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> * Debian reserves the right to revoke the permission to use the term
> `Debian', provided there is a good reason
>
> A bit vague, but it captures the above and gives us a bit more freedom.
Why have the "provided there is a goo
Is this DFSG free?
- Forwarded message from Michael Thayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 09:47:14 +0100 (MET)
From: Michael Thayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Game for Linux
> Re-upload would be best, but just sending me the license i
> On Sat, 20 Mar 1999 21:55:21 -0800, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Joey> Is this DFSG free?
Joey> The authors Michael Thayer and Michael Haar request that they
Joey> be informed, preferable by electronic mail, when this programme
Joey> is included in any software distribution (e.g
Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 11:10:18PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > 1) program A, statically linked with a library B
> > 2) program A, dynamically linker with a library B
> > 3) program A, only using header-files from library B
> Yes for these thre
A while back I saw a post (or something) on the subject of
free manuals/documentation.
I am currently packaging (Metamath for debian) a manual associated with
a system and noticed that it contained the standard copyright
notice. I asked the author about it and he (Norman D. Megill)
replied tha
I've become quite bored with having to spend brain cells determining whether
each of the two billion licenses everyone insists on creating for their
software packages is reasonable.
At this point I think I'm about to start suggesting these companies like
Netscape, Apple, and now AT&T just shoot
On Sun, Mar 21, 1999 at 04:35:09PM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 11:10:18PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>
> > > 1) program A, statically linked with a library B
> > > 2) program A, dynamically linker with a library B
> >
9 matches
Mail list logo
