Re: Postilion Copyright Troubles

1999-02-09 Thread Nic Bernstein
On 8 Feb, Marco van Hylckama Vlieg wrote: > This license seems like an ok way to go. We could also add some sort of > moral message to the notice, stating that it's allowed to use the graphics in > other software but that it's considered somewhat lame to steal the look > from an existing program.

Re: Intent to package cforge and code-medic

1999-02-09 Thread J.H.M. Dassen
On Mon, Feb 08, 1999 at 18:51:13 -0600, David Welton wrote: [code crusader] > I talked with the author a while ago, and tried to nudge him towards > the GPL. Since you cannot distribute changes, Are you sure that's still the case? Quoting the release announcement (Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Postilion Copyright Troubles

1999-02-09 Thread Richard Stallman
There would appear to be a contradiction between section 2.0, and the above COPYRIGHT.images statement, although I am not sure. I have never really understood just how graphics files, which are free standing components, are covered by the GPL. By "free-standing", do you mean that