Re: We distribute LyX?

1999-01-24 Thread Navindra Umanee
Montreal Sun Jan 24 05:47:21 1999 Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David Starner wrote: > > > Actually, LyX depends on XForms, so fixing Qt won't help. Fixing Qt will > > let us add KLyX (LyX ported to Qt), which would be a good substitute. > > Has anyone in Debian ever approached

Re: We distribute LyX?

1999-01-24 Thread Jules Bean
On Sun, 24 Jan 1999, Navindra Umanee wrote: > > Montreal Sun Jan 24 05:47:21 1999 > > Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > David Starner wrote: > > > > > Actually, LyX depends on XForms, so fixing Qt won't help. Fixing Qt will > > > let us add KLyX (LyX ported to Qt), which would be

Re: We distribute LyX?

1999-01-24 Thread Navindra Umanee
Montreal Sun Jan 24 09:10:52 1999 [disclaimer: all imho and all up for debate.] Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is Debian a paying customer here? Is it particularly appropriate for > > Debian to approach developers in this way? Isn't this something the > > XForms developers can decide

Re: We distribute LyX?

1999-01-24 Thread Raul Miller
Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There is no reason why we shouldn't approach them explaining why we think > > it would be a good idea. They don't have to agree. Navindra Umanee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's one thing if people decide to Open Source their own product of > their own a