[License issue, discussion moved to -legal. Please remove -devel from
replies.]
On Sun, 17 Jan 1999, Philipp Frauenfelder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> last year, some people did a "graphing the debian keyring".
> David Frey gave a hint about a free software to do that.
> Apparently, it is not packaged f
On Sun, Jan 17, 1999 at 07:36:33PM +, Jules Bean wrote:
> > The copyright is GPL with some uglified files (the graph layout
> > modules)---they are no longer human readable. This should be
> > acceptable to go in main.
>
> Hmm.
>
> Note that the GPL defines source code in such a way that obfusc
On Sun, 17 Jan 1999, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 17, 1999 at 07:36:33PM +, Jules Bean wrote:
> > > The copyright is GPL with some uglified files (the graph layout
> > > modules)---they are no longer human readable. This should be
> > > acceptable to go in main.
> >
> > Hmm.
> >
> > Note t
Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The copyright is GPL with some uglified files (the graph layout
> > modules)---they are no longer human readable. This should be
> > acceptable to go in main.
> Note that the GPL defines source code in such a way that obfuscated source
> code does not
[please cc me on replies as I'm not subscribed to debian-legal]
Hi,
Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Note that the GPL defines source code in such a way that obfuscated source
> code does not qualify as source code. So, by the GPL's rules, this is not
> being provided with source, which probab
On Sun, Jan 17, 1999 at 07:36:33PM +, Jules Bean wrote:
> > The copyright is GPL with some uglified files (the graph layout
> > modules)---they are no longer human readable. This should be
> > acceptable to go in main.
>
> Note that the GPL defines source code in such a way that obfuscated
> so
6 matches
Mail list logo
