Henning Makholm writes:
> Now, would a wording such as the following be seen as complying with
> the 'derived works' portions of the DFSG?
| - You may modify [the program] and use the modified form within
| your own organisation.
|
| - You may distribute a version of [the program] that you have
|
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Henning Makholm writes:
> |ii - making an honest attempt at communicating your
> | modifications to [us], e.g., by sending them by
> | email [...] You may distribute your modified
> | version even if you have not got a response yet,
> |
On Fri, Jan 08, 1999 at 02:08:55AM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Henning Makholm writes:
> > |ii - making an honest attempt at communicating your
> > | modifications to [us], e.g., by sending them by
> > | email [...] You may distribute your modif
Anthony Towns writes:
> > I.e, in addition to letting people fork our project (which I realize
> > could be necessary e.g. when our grant expires if we can not fund
> > further development man-hours), we must let them fork our project
> > and keep that a secret from us.
> >
> > Why on earth?
>
Henning Makholm writes:
> I.e, in addition to letting people fork our project (which I realize
> could be necessary e.g. when our grant expires if we can not fund further
> development man-hours), we must let them fork our project and keep that a
> secret from us.
But you've already given them per
Henning Makholm writes:
> Sure. Why, I *want* to be informed about typos. How would I be able
> to correct them in the master source otherwise?
How many thousand times do you want to be informed of typos?
Anthony Towns writes:
> Because "honest attempt" is a little bit... vague.
Henning Makholm
6 matches
Mail list logo
