Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[3]
> c. Mods must be available as free software. A note that the Trolls
>can't use stuff they can't relicense, some nice easy way to let
>them relicense your code in exchange for making sure there is
>always a free software vers
> On Tue, 22 Dec 1998 14:16:33 -0800, Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
Joseph> On Tue, Dec 22, 1998 at 10:27:17AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joseph> wrote:
>> > Anybody remembers who ships XEMacs ?
>>
>> Just about everybody, including Debian. Why?
Joseph> ... Linked to les
On Tue, Dec 22, 1998 at 05:24:29PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> [3]
> > c. Mods must be available as free software. A note that the Trolls
> >can't use stuff they can't relicense, some nice easy way to let
> >them relicense your code in exchange for making sure there is
> >
On Tue, Dec 22, 1998 at 11:52:06PM +, James Troup wrote:
> > > > Anybody remembers who ships XEMacs ?
> > >
> > > Just about everybody, including Debian. Why?
> >
> > ... Linked to lesstif ...
>
> Eh? No, it's not.
My mistake, it's not. (in case you can't tell, I do not use emacs)
--
N
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Kevin Forge writes:
> And perhaps they have special permission from the authors. These are
> private companies. We have no way to know what private arrangements they
> may have made or what their internal decision making processes are.
My point was that this never c
Joseph Carter wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 22, 1998 at 10:27:17AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Anybody remembers who ships XEMacs ?
> >
> > Just about everybody, including Debian. Why?
>
> ... Linked to lesstif ...
It's older than LessTif by years if memory serves me reasonably.
Joseph Carter wrote:
>
> 3. You may distribute modified copies if:
> a. Mods don't change the Copyright notices
> b. Your mods are distinguishable from the original source. Pretty
>much defining this the way the GPL does along with Troll Tech's
>preferences for mods as pat
Kevin Forge wrote:
>
> Joseph Carter wrote:
> >
> > 3. You may distribute modified copies if:
> > a. Mods don't change the Copyright notices
> > b. Your mods are distinguishable from the original source. Pretty
> >much defining this the way the GPL does along with Troll Tech's
> >
Kevin Forge writes:
> As an example NexT was "attacked" for making proprietary enhancements to
> GCC.
That was a clear violation of the GPL.
> However the same NeXt shipped GCC linked against it's proprietary LibC
> and _that_ wasn't mentioned as a problem.
Because it wasn't. That is *exactly*
On Wed, Dec 23, 1998 at 02:08:48AM -0500, Kevin Forge wrote:
> > c. Mods must be available as free software. A note that the Trolls
> >can't use stuff they can't relicense, some nice easy way to let
> >them relicense your code in exchange for making sure there is
> >alw
10 matches
Mail list logo
