begin Raul Miller quotation:
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 05:25:37PM -0700, Nick Moffitt wrote:
> > Combining two modules means connecting them together so that
> > they form a single larger program. If either part is covered
> > by the GPL, the whole combination must also be released un
begin Kevin A. Burton quotation:
> I assume you are saying that Tomcat/Apache and Debian become one
> program at this point?
You don't even remember the original question, do you?
No, to clarify to those whom you might confuse:
Tomcat, apache, debian, all separate programs, an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nick Moffitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#MereAggregation says:
>
> Mere aggregation of two programs means putting them side by side on the
> same CD-ROM or hard disk. We use this term in the case
On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 05:25:37PM -0700, Nick Moffitt wrote:
> Combining two modules means connecting them together so that they
> form a single larger program. If either part is covered by the
> GPL, the whole combination must also be released under the GPL--if
> you can't, or won
begin Kevin A. Burton quotation:
> Nick Moffitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > begin Kevin A. Burton quotation:
> > > If the FSF site is running Debian/GNU linux with BSD software I
> > > don't see any problem...
> >
> > I believe you misunderstand the GPL.
>
> ... well you can't just ma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nick Moffitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> begin Kevin A. Burton quotation:
> > If the FSF site is running Debian/GNU linux with BSD software I
> > don't see any problem...
>
> I believe you misunderstand the GPL.
... well you can't just mak
begin Kevin A. Burton quotation:
> If the FSF site is running Debian/GNU linux with BSD software I
> don't see any problem...
I believe you misunderstand the GPL.
--
"The only thing is certain: Russian petty computer hooligans are very
slovenly, while FBI agents are very persistent in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This means we can't distribute the tomcat deb, until such changes are
> relicensed. It also means that if the tomcat maintainer has accepted patches
> on behalf of tomcat, he needs to check with the original p
On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> Thanks for pointing this out. I have relicensed my changes under the Apache
> license and will upload a fixed package in a couple of minutes after some
> testing.
The reason I brought this up on debian-legal, is that there could be many such
packages that
Adam Heath wrote:
The upstream license for tomcat is the Apache License. The maintainer,
however, has licenses his modifications under the GPL. However, according to
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#GPLIncompatibleLicenses, the
Apache license is not compatible with the GPL.
Tha
The upstream license for tomcat is the Apache License. The maintainer,
however, has licenses his modifications under the GPL. However, according to
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#GPLIncompatibleLicenses, the
Apache license is not compatible with the GPL.
This means we can't distri
11 matches
Mail list logo
