On Sun, Apr 18, 1999 at 12:14:36AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
(first of all i hope that the Cc: field doesn't mailbombing
anybody :-))
> I consider "free except for the prohibition on derivatives" an oxymoron. The
> essential property of DFSG-freeness is the possibility to derive a new work
On Sat, Apr 17, 1999 at 11:31:20PM +0200, Andrea Fanfani wrote:
> John Hasler:
>
> The _Linux Programmers Guide_ is non-free because its license contains
> this: "If you make money with it the authors want a share."
>
> The LDP license is free except for the prohibition on derivatives. IMHO
Andrea Fanfani writes:
> Now if I have understood the programmer guide is sure a non-free but the
> others guide are DFSG complaint ( but deprecated).
> Well, your opinion
It is my opinion that the linux kernel and user guide documents should be
allowed into main. As I noted previously, others d
On Sat, Apr 17, 1999 at 04:51:26AM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
[...]
Hi I can try to make a brief summary of the discussion inside
debian-legal on the licence of the guides of linux documentation
project.
First of all you can find the licences of the guides
at www.edu.ph.unito.it/~andrea
1)
4 matches
Mail list logo
