Re: possible problem for debian was [NTP considered basic] misc@openbsd.org

2003-05-15 Thread Branden Robinson
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 03:08:25PM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote: > On Thu, May 15, 2003, Uwe A. P. Wuerdinger wrote: > > > I just catched this conversation on the misc OpenBSD mailinglist. > > Does this in any way afflict debian? > >This subject has already been discussed forever on debian-legal.

Re: possible problem for debian was [NTP considered basic] misc@openbsd.org

2003-05-15 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 02:09:34PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 02:39:15PM +0200, Jesus Climent wrote: > > On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 11:11:49AM +0200, Uwe A. P. Wuerdinger wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I just catched this conversation on the misc OpenBSD mailinglist. > > > Does this

Re: possible problem for debian was [NTP considered basic] misc@openbsd.org

2003-05-15 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 02:39:15PM +0200, Jesus Climent wrote: > On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 11:11:49AM +0200, Uwe A. P. Wuerdinger wrote: > > Hi, > > I just catched this conversation on the misc OpenBSD mailinglist. > > Does this in any way afflict debian? > > indeed seems to be a problem. Since it d

Re: possible problem for debian was [NTP considered basic] misc@openbsd.org

2003-05-15 Thread Jesus Climent
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 11:11:49AM +0200, Uwe A. P. Wuerdinger wrote: > Hi, > I just catched this conversation on the misc OpenBSD mailinglist. > Does this in any way afflict debian? indeed seems to be a problem. Since it does not grant the rights to distribute and sell the modified code, just the