|--==> Bill Morgan writes:
BM> The license looks clean to me:
BM> http://www.portaudio.com/license.html
BM> The only real restriction is not to remove the copyright statement.
BM> Is that too much for DFSG?
I think this question should be posted to debian-legal, thus I'm
taking the
Scripsit Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> (I'm assuming the actual wording of the request is fine, since nobody
> has objected to it.)
I think it is OK, but if we are picking nits, I think it would be more
clearly a non-binding request if it was rephrased in the second person
and became
I
On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 07:47:51PM +, Dave Cunningham wrote:
> PortAudio Portable Real-Time Audio Library
> Copyright (c) 1999-2000 Ross Bencina and Phil Burk
>
> Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person
> obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation
> file
>The main problem seems to be that while the sentence itself says "request",
>it's under a non-request "conditions" heading. Moving the request away
>from that--preferably out of the license entirely--should be enough.
Ok so this compromise should be ok:
PortAudio Portable Real-Time Audio Libr
On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 11:17:08PM +, Dave Cunningham wrote:
> >From my limited correspondance, and from the fact that their
> license is apparently flawed, I personally believe they are not
> experienced with licenses and legal issues, so it would probably
> be a good idea to explain very clea
On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 03:12:12PM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
>On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 06:19:50PM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
>> Since both of the words "request" and "condition" appear to apply to
>> the clause, it is ambigously phrase and Debian would take the
>> conservative position that the
On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 06:19:50PM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Since both of the words "request" and "condition" appear to apply to
> the clause, it is ambigously phrase and Debian would take the
> conservative position that the license is not free.
>
> The situation changes if you can get the
Scripsit Dave Cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Is this software's license compatible with debian policy?
Please quote licences in full when sending them to Debian-legal.
This one is not long:
| License
| PortAudio Portable Real-Time Audio Library
| Copyright (c) 1999-2000 Ross Bencina and Phil B
Is this software's license compatible with debian policy? It'd
be nice to have it in apt so that a project I'm working on can
depend on it. In the mean time, or if that is not possible, can
I work the source into my project's tarball and compile it
statically?
http://www.portaudio.com/license.h
9 matches
Mail list logo
