On Fre, 15 Dez 2000, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
> PROGRAM, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, PHYSICAL LAW
> (INLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO OHM'S LAW, SPECIAL RELATIVITY,
> GENERAL RELATIVITY AND SOD'S LAW), ORDINARY LOGIC WITH OR WITHOUT
That would be invalid because the theory of relati
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Paul Kienzle wrote:
> > BECAUSE THE PROGRAM IS LICENSED FREE OF CHARGE,
> Does the free license change the applicability of the law?
> And if it does, doesn't the fact that the license was provided
> for free immediately apply even if you don't mention that i
Paul Kienzle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This is clearly redundant and awkward, so how about:
>
> This program is provided "as is" without warranty of any
> kind. Use it at your own risk.
Nah, that's way too snappy. How about:
11. FOR REASONS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE FACT TH
Hi all,
Has anyone written a plain language disclaimer? It bothers me to see such
redundant language on licenses, especially when they must appear in every
file. I have a package ready to be distributed with Debian as soon as I
sort out the license.
Is "legalese" really a legal nec
4 matches
Mail list logo
