> In other words, under the logic of the BSD advertising clause, the
> Regents of University of California could also compel the inclusion
> of certain language in advertising flyers distributed by bookstores,
> the Book-of-the-Month Club, and so forth, since the University of
> California also has
John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would not be surprised to have a court hold that "restricted" in this
> instance applies solely to government restrictions, and that contractual
> restrictions (such as agreeing to a license) are still permissible, since
> nobody forced the company to a
On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 02:25:38PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 11:43:52AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > (a) [...] Commercial speech that is not false or deceptive and does not
> > concern unlawful activities may be restricted only in the service of a
> > substantial go
On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 11:43:52AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> (a) [...] Commercial speech that is not false or deceptive and does not
> concern unlawful activities may be restricted only in the service of a
> substantial governmental interest, and only through means that directly
> advance th
On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 09:40:46PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-05-08 at 20:17, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
>
> > They are also not enforceable in the US.
>
> Can you please provide a citation for this? I've never been able to come
> up with one.
I found one case that *might*
5 matches
Mail list logo
