saulgo...@flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com wrote:
> [...] if it is indeed required that the patent indemnity be
> requested then from a patent license perspective, the Mono
> implementation should fail Debian Legal's "Desert Island" and
> "Dissident" tests for DFSG compliance[5] because upstream
Thank you for the detailed exploration of your understanding of these
issues.
saulgo...@flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com writes:
> Not to conflate the issues of patent licensing with copyright
> licensing, but if […] , the Mono implementation should fail Debian
> Legal's "Desert Island" and "Disside
Quoting "Bradley M. Kuhn" :
Steve Langasek wrote at 19:58 (EDT) on Sunday:
we don't consider the existence of a software patent claim to be a
sufficient reason to remove software from main.
Well said. There are so many USA patents, if you tried to remove every
piece of software from main th
Steve Langasek wrote at 19:58 (EDT) on Sunday:
> we don't consider the existence of a software patent claim to be a
> sufficient reason to remove software from main.
Well said. There are so many USA patents, if you tried to remove every
piece of software from main that might be judged to practic
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:05:56PM +1000, Peter Dolding wrote:
> This is going to cause upset I know pushing all the .net applications
> out of mainline.My problem here is legal status. Debian has to
> protect all its uses commercial and non commercial a like. Mono is
> going to have to be
moonlight ms conditions not to sue
http://www.microsoft.com/interop/msnovellcollab/moonlight.mspx
http://www.microsoft.com/interop/msnovellcollab/moonlight_definitions.aspx#intermediate
"Intermediate Recipients" means resellers, recipients, and
distributors to the extent they are authorized (dir
6 matches
Mail list logo
