Sorry, this is really late, but I did not see this thread before...
On Wed, Apr 21, 1999 at 11:35:28PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> I know nothing of what the "GNU folks" requested. The license was posted
> to debian-legal and we commented on it. I had never seen the license
> before. I doubt H
Bill Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, and probably will for a while. It took me two years to work
> through the Xerox mechanisms to get the `derivative work' clause
> added. I don't anticipate going back to that well soon.
>
> However, I don't see that this is a problem; silly, perhap
Bill Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Excerpts from direct: 21-Apr-99 Re: ilu-base: ILU's license.. Henning
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (1421)
> > It puts every redistributor of the program, even if he's located
> > outside of USA under the de facto jurisdiction of US laws.
> Not if they're not appl
Bill Janssen writes:
> I spent two years pushing Xerox legal to make the changes that Richard
> Stallman and the other GNU folks requested, then as soon as I
> accomplished that (and no sooner), they started raising this issue about
> this other clause.
I know nothing of what the "GNU folks" reque
Coming up with new licenses, particularly those which hope to pass the
Open Source Definition, is hard to do. That's why most people would
recommend you use one of the several existing certified O-S licenses.
Brian
On Wed, 21 Apr 1999, Bill Janssen wrote:
> I'm sorry, Henning, but I'm n
I'm sorry, Henning, but I'm not particularly interested in working this
issue right now. I spent two years pushing Xerox legal to make the
changes that Richard Stallman and the other GNU folks requested, then as
soon as I accomplished that (and no sooner), they started raising this
issue about thi
Excerpts from direct: 21-Apr-99 Re: ilu-base: ILU's license.. Henning
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (1421)
> It puts every redistributor of the program, even if he's located
> outside of USA under the de facto jurisdiction of US laws.
Not if they're not applicable.
Bill
Bill Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Excerpts from direct: 20-Apr-99 Re: ilu-base: ILU's license.. John
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (581)
> > The license contains this bit of sillines:
> > "Any distribution of this software, a modified version thereof, or a
> > derivative work must comply with
Excerpts from direct: 20-Apr-99 Re: ilu-base: ILU's license.. John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (581)
> The license contains this bit of sillines:
> "Any distribution of this software, a modified version thereof, or a
> derivative work must comply with all applicable United States export
> control law
Rob Browning writes:
> I contacted Bill Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> who was listed in the
> Debian copyright file, and he just said that the license has been changed
> to make it completely free.
> All the new info (copyright etc.) is availble via
> ftp://ftp.parc.xerox.com/pub/ilu/ilu.html
The l
Package: ilu-base
Version: 2.0.0.12-5
Severity: wishlist
[ I'm not on debian-legal, so please cc me if I need to be involved.
The original message was also cc'ed to bugs and Matthias Klose
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> too. You don't see that because I goofed and sent
it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] which b
11 matches
Mail list logo
