On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 11:16:20AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 05:32:00PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 10:27:27AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 05:20:39PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > > > Yes, thought so, since the
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 05:32:00PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 10:27:27AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 05:20:39PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Yes, thought so, since the GPL only applies on redistribution, not on
> > > something you do in-hous
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 10:27:27AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 05:20:39PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > Yes, thought so, since the GPL only applies on redistribution, not on
> > something you do in-house.
>
> > But i think it would be fine to have the exemption and th
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 05:20:39PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> Yes, thought so, since the GPL only applies on redistribution, not on
> something you do in-house.
> But i think it would be fine to have the exemption and the
> redistribution rights of the proprietary .o nonethless.
If the exemptio
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 10:15:50AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 05:06:33PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > > > What would be needed for the proprietary part ? A licence stating that
> > > > it is ok to distribute it and link it with the GPLed driver ? Would that
> > > > b
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 05:06:33PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > What would be needed for the proprietary part ? A licence stating that
> > > it is ok to distribute it and link it with the GPLed driver ? Would that
> > > be enough ?
> > Permission to redistribute both the .o files, and binary k
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 10:02:03AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 04:38:40PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > > If their code is GPL with an exemption, and the library they use is
> > > non-free and we can legally redistribute it, and the two pieces of code
> > > will be dis
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 04:38:40PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > If their code is GPL with an exemption, and the library they use is
> > non-free and we can legally redistribute it, and the two pieces of code
> > will be distributed together, this can be uploaded to non-free. Note
> > that being
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 09:32:34AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 12:15:42PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > I am about to send upstream my latest advice on the licence issues i
> > discussed here previously, and have one last question.
>
> > To recapitulate, upstream is p
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 12:15:42PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> I am about to send upstream my latest advice on the licence issues i
> discussed here previously, and have one last question.
> To recapitulate, upstream is packaging a pci adsl modem driver, which
> use a software library to do the A
Hello, ...
I am about to send upstream my latest advice on the licence issues i
discussed here previously, and have one last question.
To recapitulate, upstream is packaging a pci adsl modem driver, which
use a software library to do the ADSL decoding. They don't have the
source to this library t
11 matches
Mail list logo
