Re: eawpats license [was: Timidity-patches eek]

2002-09-11 Thread Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
J.B. Nicholson-Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I release these patches as "fameware". If you use them in any non-private > > way, give me credit. These patches are not to be sold for profit (heaven > > forbid). They were free when I got them and so they shall remain. > > Here's where my problem

Re: eawpats license [was: Timidity-patches eek]

2002-09-11 Thread J.B. Nicholson-Owens
In addition to David Given's warning, which I agree with and I find reason enough to not consider eawpats DFSG-free, I add the following. Andrew Suffield quoted the license for eawpats: > So, basicly[sic] you can not use the analog drums or the pistol files in any > commercial work. This is out o

Re: eawpats license [was: Timidity-patches eek]

2002-09-10 Thread David Given
On Tue, 2002-09-10 at 15:27, Andrew Suffield wrote: > Here is the complete text of the 'license' for eawpats, such as it is: [...] > I couldn't remember which ones were > covered by this, so I just flatly said that the whole set was for > non-commercial use only. Since then, I have extracted the *

eawpats license [was: Timidity-patches eek]

2002-09-10 Thread Andrew Suffield
Here is the complete text of the 'license' for eawpats, such as it is: == There has been some interest in using this patch set commercially. I am flattered, but I'm not sure what to say here. I know that there are some patches that came from the ultrasnd mirrors which contained notices that they