On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 09:41:52PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > There is no notice of any confidentiality in the message(s) you
> > cite. Furthermore, even if there were, the Debian Project was and
> > is not party to any such agreements.
Mark Rafn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm almost certain we'd do so. But we'd do it in such a way as to make
> the person who asked it sorry they'd ever bothered. This would begin with
> putting equally-offensive information that is NOT copyrighted in place of
> the alleged copyright violation
> Branden> I'm opposed to us practicing Stalinistic revisionism on
> Branden> our list archives.
On 12 Mar 2002, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Me too. However I don't think it's worth getting slapped with a
> copyright lawsuit over.
Your positions are not contradictory. We can make reasonable e
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 04:08:25PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > I'd argue that the disclaimer only matters if the person posted the
> > content to the list themselves rather than have it forwarded and even
> > then possibly only if they knew it was a
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There is no notice of any confidentiality in the message(s) you
> cite. Furthermore, even if there were, the Debian Project was and
> is not party to any such agreements.
In the present case, the emails were sent by eemuconcept.com to a
particular
> "Branden" == Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Branden> On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 04:08:25PM -0500, Sam Hartman
Branden> wrote:
>> I'd argue that the disclaimer only matters if the person posted
>> the content to the list themselves rather than have it
>> forwar
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 04:08:25PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I'd argue that the disclaimer only matters if the person posted the
> content to the list themselves rather than have it forwarded and even
> then possibly only if they knew it was a list.
>
> I believe Thomas had an excellent explanat
> "Branden" == Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Branden> --XZq0mbLCR4KNTYFe Content-Type: text/plain;
Branden> charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline
Branden> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Branden> Please review the Disclaimer for Debian's Publi
Please review the Disclaimer for Debian's Public Mailing Lists:
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/disclaimer
For your convenience, the text of this disclaimer follows:
Disclaimer for the Debian mailing lists
Our mailing lists are public forums, and our mailing list archives are public.
Sam Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> While this may be true for confidentiality, it is certainly not true
> for copyright. If we published their text without their permission,
> we must rely on a fair use defense or we are in violation of their
> exclusive rights under copyright.
>
> At leas
> "Chris" == Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Chris> On Mar 12, Anna wrote:
>> It came to our attention that Debian have published on one of
>> their mailing lists ("debian-legal") our company's confidential
>> e-mail exchange.
>>
>> This has been done withou
On Mar 12, Anna wrote:
> It came to our attention that Debian have published on one
> of their mailing lists ("debian-legal") our company's confidential e-mail
> exchange.
>
> This has been done without seeking our consent
> and we urge Debian to remove the entry and the follow-ups from its
>
"Anna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It came to our attention that Debian have published on one of their
> mailing lists ("debian-legal") our company's confidential e-mail
> exchange.
I don't know which address in those messages you mean.
Are you complaining about the mention of the various emai
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Anna wrote:
> It came to our attention that Debian have published on one of their
> mailing lists ("debian-legal") our company's confidential e-mail
> exchange.
This is incorrect terminology. Jorgen Hagg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
published a message, and used debian-legal to do so
To whom it may concern,
It came to our attention that Debian have
published on one of their mailing lists ("debian-legal") our company's
confidential e-mail exchange.
This has been done without seeking our
consentand we urge Debian to remove the entry and the follow-ups from its
archive
15 matches
Mail list logo
